Meltonia Shoecream Uk

These are the PTC which now stands at the beginning of 2010

PTC These are actually maintained over time without becoming SCAM. You are now reliable and recommend.

LeePubli : Multiple ways to receive payments through Alertpay, Paypal, westernunion, etc.
pay for reading emails that come to your mailbox, to visit and register web pages on other sites. Now add the ability to earn points that are redeemable for cash. You gain more money the more referrals you! gives you 2 euros to register!

http://www.leepubli.com/pages/index.php?refid=richard22



Publifacil: Te paga por Paypal y westerunion. Te paga por leer mails. Varios niveles de referidos (4x7).

http://www.publifacil.com/5227824

http://www.publifacil.com/2013847





Is abelclicks : Otra buena PTC. En múltiples idiomas. Paga por Alertpay, Pagseguro y Paypal a los $3 como mínimo.

http://www.isabelclicks.com/register.php?r=richard22



Donkeymails: This page gives you many possibilities. Win viewing pages, reading emails, through games, you can earn points to move them to visit your websites, etc.
Pays for E-gold, Paypal and Alertpay. Minimum charge $ 1.
5 levels of referrals.

http://www.donkeymails.com/pages/index.php?refid=richard22



Palmbux:

$ 0.01 (1 cents) per click.

$ 0.01 (1 cents) for referral clicks

Instant Payment The minimum payout is
$ 2 and Instantly!.

https: / / www.palmbux.com/register.php/richard22.html

Military Ball Dresses

That difficult job of always making people laugh

* This vicious circle makes you want to be as far as possible, but also let you know I always come back, again and again, because basically the last thing you want is to be away.


The outcome was exactly as she predicted. "You're a fool. 're Going to lose both. " Said and done. This is your story, dreamy. Wednesday who understands you.

POSTING AS BANNED
People around you, my dear dream, not surprised one bit when he commented that you liked and you were going to heaven, one of the best friends of your ex girlfriend. Total, already had something with two ex from a friend. And had even recognized that strange weakness for women in the other. Perhaps this new facet was just an extension of your uncontrollable temper .


To accomplish your task you should have to be patient and wait. I knew from that day in that white skirt and the two thick legs and brown, delicious, dark, I completely changed the perspective. But you were my friend, hope and respect the relationship he had at that time. The wait took its unexpected fruits and suddenly I was alone and wouldst sooner face and melted into endless and impassioned kisses. Everything happened so fast, you could not process the evolution of a friend of your ex - girlfriend - exit. One day was one and the next day another. Nothing to complain about, dreamy. I had managed , and were so happy.

OFFICE THAT HARD TO DO ALWAYS LAUGH
must accept, my dear dream, that never thought it would be so complicated. The initial impediments: he left a complicated relationship, the former should not know and the summer tour would do in 4 months (this time you gave truth and not some game). You said you only think about the present and not in the future, but deep down you know it: your goal was to convince gradually. Overcoming a barrier

not got easier. Told the former and plucked a large . On the one hand, she had taken good your friend and you are so feet, on the other, your ex was helping and accompanying at a sensitive time for you: your grandfather was wrong and she was on your side. Did you pick the right moment to tell?

But that barrier, although stumbling, losing the friendship of your ex, the beat. But there were other more difficult: their problems could not tell. But so blind, you were at his side, and without asking you doomed to make her feel good. To make her laugh every day. To be by her side as much as you could. Hardly slept in days. But I always had the spirit to make her laugh. Laughing kill anything, but together, it was the best reward for the humble office of always make the other person smile.

DAMN TRAP
The first time left out by the rantings of the former. The second, too. Best not to comment on the serious but temporary slip of blue in that brief period of separation and the strong argument that seemed the very end, but it was just another false alarm.

The new venture seemed final. So you thought. You fell in love, my dear dream. Again. You lost your head and also the direction. Lost track of your humble trade and fell into despair, completely understandable and logical, the paranoia of love and not power.

why this egocentric 'I' to think that if it was rare it was for you. How can we expect demand more when it was blue that you looked back a week later to tell you "would you, if I travel outside?.

But his problems were always greater than your charms. You trade for the love he expiration date. One day (a bad night, really) a fruitless talk block the way . Despite your previous attempts, these letters, emails, phone calls, kisses and such close encounters do not change nothing. A final conversation, weeks later, he completed to close the crossing.

CURTAIN IS DOWN
finished in good condition. Her story was short, but not yours, dreamy. You even had an issue to be resolved. That's why I showed up unexpectedly at the house of your ex and thanked him very few words (which I've never done before) for being next to you at this difficult time of your grandfather, and accept that we came forth with one of its best friends was the best decision not just in this context.

was a great gesture and a righteous act. But the way you pursue the drama, your gesture was not only misunderstood, but played the wrong way, and straight to the ears of heaven.

That's the price to be good, dreamy. You can blame karma does not let go years. You blame yourself and repeat yourself over and over again that you dug your own grave, to every voice you said, and even echo, you do not, but you did it knowing the end for a stubborn and romantic desire to change destiny. Cursed

romantic. And you can blame

also do what you can fuck: they already have to another. And she can blame you for that 'I' of which both complained of you and you cling to hate you for this misunderstanding of your gesture thank you once brought down the curtain. Pure

excuses to forget. Bitter flapping of a drowned trying to bring it current as a forgetful fish. They say that hate is the best pill to forget. But others prefer to stay away. Being close to death can be like pieces. And you're self-destructive, my dear dream. Otherwise you can not explain this stubbornness for wanting to stay near the inside knowing that you're doing shit. Wednesday

Who understands you.


Catupecu Machu - Magia Veneno


"What you ask, what I can, which is in trials.
all about to be altered, provided all time. (...)

of light into the dark, magic poison.
From the dark into the light, everything new.
breathe, and live to die drunk "



...... And this verse also Catupecu Machu (Spell):

" win or lose, I know I never care, what is the risk that haunts .

(...) and climb to another level, and you can not even get to touch it.
and feel like you're completely exhausted and do not understand why. "

After Waxing How Long Until You Can Fake Tan?

The truth of the lies

The relationship that best brand is the one you change.
What you do then be a result of what you've done before. Or what I have done. Or else you never did .

not return to lead the way your next relationship. There will be things you will do differently. Things to do and let others this time they're willing to do. This time, believe some things, others do not. This time not sin naive. This time will not make a martyr.


Each as he touched. I became suspicious. Super suspicious. Ask me to rely a lot. At just believe in myself. But not even trust my every step.

learned that things have a reason. Although they appear not have it. Sometimes you manage to know instantly, others will fall like cold water baldaso almost a year later.

When you see similar traits, like actions, similar responses, you wonder if you're digging your own grave.

But you're stubborn. And for something you are. There's something there that makes you go. Do not want to think anymore. Do not you think maybe it's just stubbornness, which could be not wanting to be alone, many variables. Would a simple self-destructive mood ?

cares. When you want something, you want as it comes. Think you have a limit, but you realize it's becoming more elastic. And a day you say "already" and the other think the opposite. And it becomes a vicious circle. And

not understand it. You can not understand. You despair and perhaps better to send everything to hell. And feel free to do anything you do. But it's only a matter of time before you realize that what you feel is stronger than their disability. Cursed

vicious circle. Learn from your old relationship. Learned. But learning does not mean correct. Learn is just to know.

And when answers are not inevitably launch a thousand scenarios. Without wanting to take over and give it of course because of something you have to take. Everything will be easier if I told you, but now are you who must solve the mystery. And resolve it in the head no more because you have nothing solid. (And woe if I told you ..)

And always come back. Always come back. And you always dock. Always dock.
No. Not always. Not always both.
But any reconciliation, any new opportunity is always well regarded.
And you wait. On the outside proves otherwise.
But inside you know very well that I always expect.

always hope.

Marble Mouse Bluetooth

Sleep Sleep Sweetheart

Mens Butt Waxing Montreal

Drama queen and almost a dog in the manger Let's play hide and seek

* Almost a dog in the manger. Lives, but it is live. Happy, but does not allow others to be. He takes it personally. Is only thinking about herself.

In the ocean of relationships, I am a fish contreras. Swim upstream. I do not follow conventions.

always followed a motto: while do not hurt anyone, is pa 'lante. And I did. In the tangled world of relationships, I learned to be good after a few times, and I got a little shot in the foot.



There are things that at first sounds very complicated and even give a bad feeling, bad vibes. I too have lived in the flesh this, but I will put the example a friend, because its outcome is more honest and more product is a natural choice, not imposed.

Companion, pal, you do that fell short of the circumstances. An example of maturity and overcome. A sample of understanding, the antithesis of selfishness and a model of lucidity.

ever told me that his ex-girlfriend was rare. Do not be greeted like that in his presence was acting strange. Then, though it told me then told him they had seen one of his best friends with her. I think it was a couple of times, in a nightclub.

At that time, was unable to relate the two things. But then I understand well. As by magic, all the pieces together and the final conclusion was like a shot thundered his mind, but not his body. Simple: the shot was not directed at him.

That's why I took sport. It seemed strange situation, but I knew I had not done for much less scrubbing. He also knew that he no longer felt anything for her and then had no reason to bother.

"Building a scandal because it was his ex? He thought he was above such a senseless tragedy. Opted for a decision more pants, went to talk to his friend to ask if she went with her and tell her that he had no major If so problems. He beat him and told him the truth: out, they liked and wanted . But just out. There were no plans to be.

... ... ... ... ...

is inevitable and necessary to recall some aspects a priori. The three had already said in previous post, so I just mention them, to bear this in mind: No one owns it, no one decides who's going to start to like and deny feelings is unnatural.

... ... ... ... ...

My friend agreed, not without feeling a bit strange his friend out with his ex. Not that you asked permission, but given how unusual it was better than I knew. Soon after, a couple of questions, answers and uncertainties that will air it hovered mind.

1. What if instead of being so comprehensive, it would have done more if my first instinct and became the surprise in a bad mood, in a discussion with a friend? How much would have changed my relationship with him? What happened?

concluded that he had sinned terribly selfish and a bad friend. If he did not feel anything for his ex, why deny it fun, affection and companionship to an of your best friends? And above all, if his good friend did nothing to harm or scrub, why he did do it? It would not make much sense.

2. Should he make a drama for the former because they 'got' with one of your best friends? Again

felt over wanting to create a tragedy from the subject. He accepted that he did it on purpose. And if they had finished two years ago, did bother much sense? Resolved that the image that would project would be an ex still has feelings. And nothing more false than that. So what? Half found no answer. Why mere convention? What nonsense, he thought.

3. Should he listen more to their friends?
Firstly, all agreed it was wrong about his ex and her leg. He thought then that he must think alike. If everyone thought like that, it must be right. But what I did not realize then was that his friends told him just what he wanted to hear. Or simply nodded, not saying what he really thought. When told they had decided to be normal about it, there just was told that it was indeed the best, because there was nothing to do roches. And although there was a couple who had set themselves, God knows why, to create drama and wanting to impose discomfort and resentment, not left to influence and was smarter than that.


His change of attitude was not free. That at one time may have seemed strange to have annoyed him, and then accepts it without drama or roches, not the product of a simple change of mood.

face the strangeness of the moment, a good book upon him. It was preferable to think of something else. A phrase came to light.

" Almost a dog in the manger. Lives, but not to live. Happy, but does not allow others to be. He takes it personally. Is only thinking about herself. Drama queen and always ends being as she wants it. So at the expense of the other scour life. Their selfishness does not believe in her friends. "

He did not end well. You do
vouchers, my brother.

* My case was not the end. But that already is subject of the next post.

At least (by mail) I'll leave it.
What is it with you That makes me act like this? (8)

Pink (in video is better)

Ulcers, Sore Throat And Headache

santiago not sleep is revealed (for latransistor.blogspot.com)

What Is The Best Laptop For Djing

to crush pinkit

Red Leotard Halloween

* Letter a lady and a song to be considered.



Some spaces look more likely to be discovered to start a hot lovemaking session.

Others begin a forbidden relationship, adrenaline and pleasing to the bug that others do not know what happens at your side.

I declare myself part of the second group.

In my case, not a game. Not on purpose. Just

I figured it out and I can draw two conclusions from this, without revealing explicitly what my situation is up to.


1. No one owns it.

When a relationship ends, it is assume that this implies a real purpose. Still exists the possibility of an eventual return, at least momentarily set the closure of a road. If it reopens or not, that is another issue.

Therefore, anyone (and I stress, anyone) can start a relationship with one of those two people.

This brings me to my second point.

2. Denying feelings is unnatural.

One does not decide who is going to like. That just happens.
(Yes you can choose who you will like it and do everything to achieve it, but that too is another subject.)

Therefore, I consider establishing restrictions understandable but futile certain actions triggered by the taste.

- Let your friends (as) not to mess with your ex.
- That your ex can not mess with your friends (as).
- That you can not get involved with someone of your work (and be your boss).
- Etc, etc. Prickly

field.

I am sure that most states that as maximum. However, breaking them is more common than you think.
The fact that it usually does well. But human.

And I do not mean that to err is human (which is true), but it is part of our instinct to feel attracted to someone, whoever he is.

Not to be a bad person. Scrubbing is not someone. Less than revenge.
When things happen, no chain that binds to the feelings.
bodies can move away, but the spirit and act on their own hearts, not our mandate.

Let your feelings lift flight.
anyone tell you that you can not do.
When something becomes true (Meant to be), the rest ends up sorted. The other end to accept it.

But it is not necessary to learn as fast.
Let things flow and that whatever has to happen. Good or bad, happy or sad. Illusion or deception. Of course, hopefully the best.

But do not take lightly these truths.
They are not easy to assimilate or lead.

For the time is right: Let's play hide and seek.

We have the advantage that we have the limit of many seconds.
still have time to time.
us live day to day without thinking so much about the what ifs.
This chapter only if we write it to him.
meantime, continue writing with the same ink fun and full of love chapter in which we live.

And anyone tell us otherwise.



Photo:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/francalejandra/2090226546/

How Many Possibilities On A 5 Number Lock

Do not write a poem accepted normal girls

* Human , ergo contradictory.

poem Do not write any verses about you

because abound in the pages of our memories.
constants in our reunion.

That is what is ours: a constant.

Not that there is nothing more to say about you.
could write endless lines about yourself.

But I prefer an image.
A photograph of yourself.
an infinite memory.
spasm with your smile.
An introverted hedonism.
A great tremor. And an orgasm
colors.

would be enough to keep line has to write.


... The lines illusion.
margins ... disorientation.


(and try)
And do not write poetry because it is encoded
my purpose to reach your intellect.

The sole purpose of this ink is confess to something you probably already know.

is so contradictory. Human
, ergo beast.

And much preamble, I'll tell you the same coarseness with which the truth (the real truth, truth itself) is always revealed:


"I liked you from the first moment I saw you"


And do not put it out of any song, ah. Of any book.

should not make any kind of metaphysical thought experiment to get at the truth.
The truth is not in front of your eyes.
But neither have to relinquish your body to find it.
This there.
is in thine own eyes.
human eyes, eyes of a beast.


But I'll tell you completely.

"I liked you from the first moment I saw you.
And I never liked going to stop. "

never left to do.

I liked others, too.
But you always manage to keep you there. As a reminiscence


like a warm breath at my side always reappear somewhere

call. Sometimes you, sometimes mine.
in a msn conversation endless.
in one appearance for the campus.
in a quote ("we met, no?) In the cafeteria.

A premonition told me you would always come back.
a precognition of a story that was repeated countless times.

an eternal crush. That
, a platonic love.



So not confuse it with the tangible intangible.

If you talk followed by msn, not because it can not be there without it. And if you

Gile, not because I melt for you mine forever.

And if I call you, not because they need to hear your voice to sleep peacefully.

And if I invite you to leave, not because you are attempting to be with you.

And if you love or do I keep your smile looking petrified, not because I die for you.

And if I kiss you, not because I can not live without you.

itself is so that I can die in peace, knowing that the effigy
your essence
remain cloistered in a crystal ball,
that every time you rub in that random circumstances reminiscent
a déjà vu
reveal your image as a intangible existence, capable of emanating
me a perverse tenderness
hallucinate but unable to make me miserable, lonely and unhappy.


understand Will I leave?

There was a time that I liked.

Today only likes me figuratively.

Blogalaxia Tags: reminiscent
love poem

Full Head Of Highlights On Brown Hair

* No more complicated.

So I'm going to run out of women. That is clear. I have a self-destructive tendency: I have a magnet that attracts more complicated. And I'm not like that, but apparently my radar itself.

I'm not saying it's wrong that two people opposed to stick together. The problem is when everything is doomed to failure. When after you realize that you always knew how it would end, what things would happen. Or at least you could provide.



People are always looking for opposites. Polo
negative to positive.
not going negative with negative. Positive to positive
not happen.

A good girls like bad boys. That the cops, they become the cocky, they are complicated, their relationship is full of ups and downs, who fight for everything, and again ending again and again. They like to hang on to them. I hardly think that is going to be alone. Perhaps they believe they will not find another.

But if you're so good ... You're a good person, you'll be a good professional. You're cute. You have the whole package ready and certainly there are a waiting list. But always leave you convinced by him. Say over and over again that no longer come back, but deep down you know you will. And he will give away things, you will earn your forgiveness.

The bad guys always take good girls. You have such confidence that you know you always have control. They can do whatever they want because they always forgive. Can do and say whatever they want because they know they say, "That's it. But I love him. "

And the good guys were in a romantic movie in which good always wins and gets the best girl. Fall in love with her and give her life for her. Are fixed in every detail. Always give the reason. Always agree with her. Never say "no."

And bad girls see him as a prince. They believe they found someone who will fly. Say they have already matured. Now are someone else. And without realizing it, little by little they are bored. Little by little they are doing business as usual. The same mistakes. The same story.

And the story (again came to) move back ends. Make them over and over. And then the dispatch saying: "You are very good for me. You deserve someone better than me. "

O but still a lifetime. There always has to be something wrong. Sometimes the opposite is perfect. The add-in that we seek. I have no she does have. What I have not her. Penpal. You complete me.

But the battery is not eternal. Batteries, either.
These poles have an expiration date.
What begins full battery eating up all their energy.

Do we put the batteries?
can work.

Recarguémoslas. Let us
Duracell bunny.

But beware of the short circuit.
We're going to electrocute.

Not everything that binds lasts over time.

Last time a friend told me: "You always mess with each girl ...." I gave him the reason.

Maybe I should put a sign on the front. I would say something like: "We accept normal girls." And of course, to comply with some requirements that I said I like all .

And is that not only girls get involved with complicated; also looking for some reason, the girls would be very difficult to establish something serious. Or at least get to establish something even.

My instinct self-destructive (as I said in forbidden love and impossible love ) prompts me to fantasy (and sometimes even get involved) with which they have boyfriends, with banned because they are friends of some former, with the former a friend of mine, with the love of a leg.

So I am doomed to failure.

And to top it off, removing stones, 60% of the last 10 women found to be old loves. Or affair. Ie I have a tendency to revive things past. A remember, they say. And one of the other is a forbidden fruit. Sweet, very sweet, but they say prohibited.

Again: So, I'm bound to failure.

Please accept normal girls!

Blogalaxia Tags:

accepted

normal girls are looking for normal girls

good guys bad girls

Is It True About The Bloods Initiation

New PTC to earn extra money! Another PTC

BUxwiz:
click: $ 0.01 Referral click $ 0.005

Payment by: PayPal and Alert (Instant payment) payment
Min: $ 2

http://www.buxwiz.com/r?r=richard22.html

Tuibux:
$ 0.01 click
$ 0.005 per click referral
$ 2 minimum payment: paypal and alertpay

http://www.tuibux.com/?r=richard22

White Particles In Urine Female

War crimes unpunished

"No había en Gaza innocent" - 26 soldiers by explaining participaron en la guerra a una las NGOs Israeli atrocities during 22 days of contienda



Public here the full report in El Pais, because I think it is enlightening.
For lack of time, I was unable to do the translation. The underlines are mine.

"We opened fuego y no hacemos preguntas "." We were told to wipe out as much as possible in our area . " My commander told me, half smiling, half seriously, that such demolitions could be added to its list of war crimes ." If we ever spoke of innocents, was to say that there was no innocent . It is the turn of the Israeli soldiers. Leaders, Jewish academics and analysts, politicians and Palestinian civilians, international NGOs and local United Nations. They have all researched and drawn conclusions from the war that the Israeli army against Gaza launched last winter. "War?" Is it really plausible called battles with artillery and tank shelling and fire launched from helicopters and airplanes? "asks the lawyer Michael Sfard, advocate in Israeli courts of many Palestinian victims of the army." It's the attack harder than it has violated the State of Israel to an urban area densely populated by civilians, "Sfard added. Some former Israeli diplomat admits, demanding not be cited, ground operations, after the first week of air strikes were" excessive. "But now have told Breaking the Silence (Breaking the Silence), an Israeli NGO, 26 officials implicated in the campaign. Some were planted before the cameras and preferred that his face was blurred. Other, as the experienced reservist Sergeant Amir, openly. His description causes chills and explains why several areas of Gaza seemed devastated by an earthquake. They all find it very difficult to swallow the tagline that the leaders of your country use the piece: "The Army of Israel", they say, "is the most moral in the world." The war in Gaza has been a full stop. There were no rules and war crimes, according to NGOs, were not far from isolated incidents.


Everything was designed to undertake a war without casualties "in the words of Sfard. And tells Yehuda Shaul, a director of Breaking the Silence, " the best way to defend is triggered massive fire. So the enemy sticks his head. It bombed residential neighborhoods and knowing that they would kill civilians. After throwing leaflets over a neighborhood, it was decided that could kill whoever . " 1,400 Palestinians killed in 22 days of fighting, a large majority of them civilians . Palestinian militias killed three innocent Israelis with Kassam rockets. Of the nine soldiers killed, four were by friendly fire. Some 50,000 houses, 200 schools, nearly a thousand factories were damaged or in ruins, according to United Nations. The struggle between the military and militia was the exception in a campaign in which soldiers fired at water tanks out of boredom, in which phosphorus bombs were dropped on civilian areas, where many soldiers took to looting, and in which guns were fired to rouse a company.

" The rules of engagement did not distinguish between combatants and civilians did not take into consideration that the fighting took place in an area where it was known the presence of children, women and elderly, were used weapons with precision radio inappropriate for areas full of civilians, the widespread devastation, the systematic destruction, its incredible magnitude, destruction houses, apartments, public buildings and properties, in many cases without an apparent need to respond to military, "says Sfard." Shoot anyone who is not supposed to be in a place "was a rule designed to prevent low own . At any price. No precise orders were given, but all agree that the soldiers had to do anything to avoid falling wounded. A military admits that was used in profusion so-called "wet entrance." That is, the search of a house clean shot. Sometimes launching anti-tank missiles. Then he would check what was inside.

destruction, deliberate as The testimony was carefully planned. Before the war, during training, "we realized that this time it was not a campaign but a war in which you take off the gloves ... The considerations that were used to hearing about the rules of engagement , and efforts to avoid harming innocent be heard this time. On the contrary ... A commander told us not to have second thoughts about any threat, real or imagined, that we feel ... The idea was to open fire and not try to consider the implications. Before any obstacle, any problem, open fire and no questions asked. If a car on the road flattens out, if a building is bombed. This is the spirit that aired during training, "says Amir.

The religious component also played a role." leaflets were distributed with the seal of the Army and Chief Rabbinate material containing explicit policy: the Palestinians were described as the Philistines, new on this earth. As aliens in this land that we must return. Then Rabbi Chen talked about the sanctity of the people of Israel and that we were fighting a war between light and darkness filled with apocalyptic and eschatological connotations. The language was very messianic. The war between light and darkness was the preparation for redemption. But more disturbing than the religious issue was the demonization of the other, the children of darkness, while we were the children of light. This is very problematic because it would be expected to make a distinction with civil "tells military.

An activist of the Breaking the Silence Israeli NGO asks Amir, who served in Gaza and the West Bank several times as Reservist: "This was new to you?" Yes. Without any shadow of doubt ... I never received instructions or permission to behave like this ... Somehow, the Army always suggesting ways to try to prevent injuries. On this occasion, the feeling was reversed. As if to hurt civilians play a role in the considerations ... If we ever talked about was innocent and told us that there would be innocent. All there were the enemy. It's a phrase we hear the commander of the brigade ... There were rules for combat. The rule was shooting. "

tells a soldier who observed a man with a torch and a white shirt approached. He asked his commander for permission several times deterrent shots (a few meters away for the Palestinian to stop) after reports that the man was not armed. The officer was not granted it . When he was very close, how much the officer: "Suddenly an explosion of fire coming up and blew us all. The man began to scream. Do not forget while I live. Everybody was shooting and the man screamed. The commander came downstairs and said, 'This is the beginning of the night. " They asked the commander because he had not authorized the fire of deterrence, and said, 'It's night and it was a terrorist. " When told that the man had only a torch, he replied: 'No matter, it was night' ... The next day we sent a dog to detect explosives had. I had nothing. Only your torch.

As President Shimon Peres and several government members repeated ad nauseam that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups used human shields in their operations and that his accusations were propaganda, it is clear, according to these witnesses, the Israeli army if used. "Johnnies." So the military called on the Palestinians who were forced, at gunpoint and handcuffed, to enter the houses suspected of harboring militants. On occasion, one must enter more than once to try to persuade the militia gunmen to surrender. What if they did not surrender, the house was knocked down on them? "Yes," answered a sergeant in the Golani Brigade. Sometimes forcing the Palestinians to drill holes in walls with jackhammers to avoid any risk that soldiers will encounter a booby trap.

"did not need much fire. I have a feeling that the Army sought an opportunity to perform a spectacular show of force.'s The only explanation for the use of mortars in an urban area," explains sergeant in an infantry brigade which was sent to Netzarim, south of Gaza City. " The war aims were vague. But we said we had to raze most of the area possible. This is a euphemism for systematic destruction." The officer explained that the houses were knocked down for two reasons. An operational: the suspicion that in a house weapons were stored or if it were based tunnels, or if there were signs that had been excavated. The second reason called it "The day after, keeping in mind that the operation was of limited duration. " The idea was to make a sterile area behind us when we left. And the best way to do that was to sweep the area. It would have good firepower, visibility open. We could see everything. That meant the demolition for "Day After". In practice, this was down houses that were not suspected. I can even say that in a conversation with my commander, he said, half smiling, kind of sad that this could be added to its list of war crimes. "

not spared methods and resources." all means of destruction were used, at least I know. The houses were demolished by bulldozers D-9 who worked continuously, but the artillery, helicopters, tanks and aircraft were also used. And 81-mm mortars, I think. And, of course, special units of engineers who were blasting a home. The explosions were constant. Did not always know why, but flew home every day. " Around where the company installed this sergeant was not fighting." No, no. Overall we saw no one alive, except the soldiers. "He also has experience in the Gaza Strip, the sergeant agrees with the other soldiers:" The destruction was on a different scale. I had never known such firepower.

What worries you about this operation? And another soldier responds: "First, so much destruction, all that fire on innocents. The shock of realizing who I've been in this. As my colleagues behave! It's amazing, inconceivable ... All this hate, enjoy killing. (They said): 'I have killed a terrorist uuuau. " 'He blew his head. "Another partner is shown relieved have been assigned to another drive with more veteran soldiers. "They were not trigger-happy," he says.

The army expressed regret that another NGO has issued a report with anonymous witnesses. At least one, the sergeant Amir, it is not. "

Ge Food Processor Manual

Methods political ...


Assassin investigava abuse activist uma na Chechnya


"Natalia Estemirova, head of the branch of the Memorial organization in Chechnya, was brutally murdered hours after being morning kidnapped outside his home in Grozny. With his passing away of Chechnya's most important source of independent information about abuse, outrages and crimes committed with impunity on the regime of Ramzan Kadyrov in this Caucasian republic. "

and other
Fonte da notícia em: The Country



Ao ler this news, livro recordei Deste-me da, aussi à força das silenced bullets, Anna Politkovskaya:

Make Your Own Wrestler Name

Secret Rulers of the World: The Bilderberg Group-BBC Documentary

Secret Rulers of the World, The Bilderberg Group BBC Docu.

Dragon Ball Adult Doujinshi

Voices Against Globalization-Amos

A lucid picture about Globalization an excellent documentary of TVE. Unmissable.

Voces contra la Globalisation (Otro es posible world) from SOLUCIONES Ciudadana on Vimeo .

What Is Mastebating What Is Mastebating?

For the first time is always the best.

* So I always shoot my first few times. Here my 6 big issues.

1.Mi
first kiss I'd like to tell a story fresasa sweet, but does not exist. I gave my first kiss playing the "bottle drunk." We were 3 boys and 4 girls. Driving up to 13 years.

That night things were ahead. Innocent and dreamy, I thought my first kiss would be great: a beautiful girl (which I also removed the breath), shaking an inch from his lips, looking with eyes who is about to do something he wanted to make full life, with his arms around and caressing the waist. And that first-kiss but perfect. And looking back, rubbing noses, smiling shyly. Do we hold hands? That kiss that never happened.



Instead, it was timed kiss. I could not say it was as if time stopped. Not so. And so was the game. "A kiss for 10 seconds with that", "20 seconds with a language with such another."

At least I could say I knew what I was kissing a girl.

time and more women would be responsible for improving the technique.

2.Mi
first rule is a proper name: "Home Alone." It had to happen, and it happened.

That miniskirt (better call it microfalda) was a clear call to lose one's chastity. Those thick legs and asked brunettes good enough to be explored.
Those lips were free entry to a great performance.

And only you knew. But that did not matter. A chair that does not mind being the scene of these "pre" troublemakers. In that room did not bother to turn off their lights to be seen naked inaugural ceremony. To that bed was no problem the constant moan emitted with each movement. "Jiju, jiju, jiju." These woods cheering the physical deployment of lovemaking. These sheets are impregnated with a hot sweat, revealing and enjoyable.

Who cared if we were novices in the field? Can I get you took me in that bra? What I was so awkward with these untrained movements? Do some things I was ashamed, remember?

There's nothing like the first orgasm. God bless
condoms.

3.Mi first crush
I find it a bit strange and funny at the same time talk about you after I found out by Facebook recently that you are a happy wife. And I a bachelor with no luck.

The first is always the best: the most naive, the most honest, the most naive, the cutest.

I said some months ago:

"I forget my first love. I saw a sunny morning sanbartolina breeze breathing, divisándote in the distance. From you I must say it was love at first sight. From the first second that I found on a small blue and yellow boat, smiling happy life surrounded by your friends. Your hair is yellow, intense as that morning sun, shining like the lively spirit that my short 8 years learning what being in love.

And then wove around a fantasy world that revolved around your small stature, but contained a myriad of ways in which you and I would end up together forever. I did not think of anything else in those days, I must admit. But my biggest confession is that this madness lasted me at least six years. Six years! Is that this was you, J. Your beauty was beyond description. To me, you were a goddess. And so I felt like a God when we played the 'enamoraditos', and you and I were walking arm in arm. Radiates warmth that I immersed myself in a dream world.

And that's not ever forgive myself for not having understood that signal in that disastrous day that appeared to be like everyone else, but years later, from one moment to another, as if light illuminate a light bulb in my head, took total sense. Because I understood: "Did you know that I find funny?". And I said, "And So who does not know! ". And your face with an expression of confusion and disappointment all I would say years later. YEARS.

And you said this: "Did you know that I find funny?". And to me I can only stay with the image of that time: a morning sanbartolina, you and your small, slender and developed body, your about 15 years old then, your two bulky monument to feminine beauty that brought me so mad, just bare skin bikini wearing a blue, blue and your eyes also so pervasive, the footprint of your being in love was not and never will be.

How can I forget, J. "

4.Mi first heart broken
Not everything is nice when you fall in love. The betrayal, disappointment, not being reciprocated, botch, the lack of chemistry, everything is on the agenda. These sweet and innocent fifteen years proved to be a poison for the heart. But, as would the great Calamaro: "First, I want the same." So I said some months ago:

"I needed more lines to write something. The story is long and complicated. I must say, first of all, which I felt ready to start a serious relationship. And life right there I hit the wall. I called Karma, and blamed everything bad I did in the past.

think about you is always smiling. Our experience shows that sometimes forgiveness is a perfect act. Endless nights I still remember our conversation by the computer. Telling us our entire lives and always seeing the webcam. I always look so cute. That's why I nicknamed 'cute', and since you were so foolish, I decided to re-apodarte 'pretty stupid. "

That summer I fell in love with you. Hold on your chair was to be in heaven. Your heart, my paradise. But I failed, Remember? I hated you after what happened, with all my heart, I swear.

But time made me forgive. It took six months without talking and there would be no more than scratches, new and endless conversations back and forth you will always marked, if you ended up with him and I talked to called me, if they were right, I forgot. And I lent the game several times, and still somewhat naive love.

shalt never look so cute as always, that's the truth. But now I am happy to know you're in love and we can talk, kill us with laughter and be friends. Even I have all the songs you wrote. Sometimes I play and sing with my guitar and I remember the sound of your laughter, your voice soft and delicate girl, thin and slim your face, your body lean, your perfect smile once christened 'post smile'.

always haunt me pica Having A never able to start a kiss. " A kiss that could describe the same way as I figured at first. And is that you learned to forgive.


5.Mi
first love I had to rediscover to understand that everything could be reinvented and that I had missed a lot. You learned to love and be loved. I again had a first date, first kiss, first fuck of hands, a first time. Ayer one thing is that you like someone and fall in love with that person. And quite another to share your time with her, to love and be loved.

you I fell in love again. You were my first love.

Night at Starbucks. Text messages.
When you wanted to know my room. Our first time.
Our Thursday in my house. My escapades at night to yours.
Your chair. My chair. Aviation.

The first time we said: "I love you."
The first time it is said in all sincerity to someone, actually.

Your dreams. My dreams.
A ring. Another ring. A promise.

distance. Return.
Doubts. Fights. The droppings. And the heartbreak.

Yes, you went back to learn everything and more. Everything. The good, the bad, the worse and the last straw. I learned to love and learned to hate. I learned to accept and returned to learn to forget.


6.Y eternal first
And I realized again that history is circular. We learn, forget and relearn. Or maybe
linear learn and learn. And yet it is something new to discover. Every relationship, every woman is a new universe, a new story.
Then, there is first of all, but there is more of a first all constantly updated. And I remember

our first outing and the first kiss I gave you at the bar. And this time I stayed here. And today I hope

usual.
A first glance. A first smile returned. A first approach. An initial conversation. A first call. An appointment. A hug. We take we hands. Caress your cheeks. Rub noses. I kiss on the lips. The taste of both. We touch. We leave for another day. He was eager to see us. We know better. Our first night. We undressed each other. We kissed the feet of the head. We endure. I make love. I make love. Sweat. Groan. Smile. We looked. Give a big kiss and cuddle. No clothes under the sheets. I tell you I love you. You tell me me too. I will tell you all my life and you to never stop loving me. We know that words can lead them to the wind. But who cares! We are happy and want to be until the end. To run out of breath. Knowing that we gave everything and it was better to separate.

And then I'll forgive you and forgive me. And I forget. And I forget.
And everyone will have a first time.

The world is like. Life is a succession of fragments. And you want to remember them all. So you live each as if it were your last. Kiss like it was the last kiss that you give. Do it as if it were the last act of lovemaking, as if the last orgasm you can give. Love like you were the last person you'll love.

And live, live forever, because there is no afterlife.

Blogalaxia Tags:
my first kiss my first time

my first crush

my first love my first broken heart

Merilyn Sakova In The Woods.

World Video by John Perkins




More information about the author of book "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" can be found HERE

Wife Bite Hubby Nipple

New links About

Here I put three new links, which I think will add interest and to the right column. The page

NAOMI KLEIN in NAOMIKLEIN.ORG ,

the teacher Catalan VICENC NAVARRO HERE


and still aa page AMY GOODMAN DEMOCRACY NOW in !

I hope they can be useful.

Tick Bite That Wont Heal

beasts, halters, or low level of a certain class politics in Portugal

During the discussion of the State of the Nation, the Minister of Economy Manuel Pinho showed all the class and grandeur that have certain types of individuals who go into politics.

How To Mastrabate A Woman

The Common Good

in. El Pais

Mens Volleyball Slogans

"There'sa lot of mythology that we need to dismantle" - Noam Chomsky:

"In this interview Noam Chomsky talks about the current economic crisis unfolds and states:" There is much mythology that we need to dismount there, including what it says about the great growth and reducing poverty. "Chomsky highlights the new role that Latin America has played in the world and points to open a window of opportunity to change the current political-economic context. Interview by Simone Bruno
* (by agency Prensa Humanist Alternative "Sur" (APAHs), available at Largest Charter

How to explain that although many people have seen the crisis coming, those who were in leadership governments and economies were not prepared to face it?

Noam Chomsky: The basis for the crisis was predictable. A constitutive element of financial liberalization is that there will be frequent and deep crises. In fact, since financial liberalization was established some 35 years, established a trend of increasing regularity of crises and crisis ever deeper. The reasons are intrinsic and understood: they have to do fundamentally with well-known inefficiencies of the markets. Thus, for example, if you and I make a transaction, say you sell me a car, we can make a good deal for ourselves, but we do not consider the effect on others.

If I buy a car, increase the use of gas, increases pollution, congestion, etc.. But do not take these effects into account. This is what economists call externalities, which are not considered in the calculations of the market. These externalities can be enormous. In the case of financial institutions, are particularly great. The task of a financial institution is to take risks. If it is a well managed financial institution, say Goldman Sachs, it will consider the risks to itself, but the crucial phrase here is "for itself." It does not take into account systemic risks, risks to the whole system if Goldman Sachs takes a substantial loss. This means that these risks are underestimated. It is assumed more risk than you should take an efficient system that takes into account all the implications. Thus, this mispricing is simply integrates as part of the market system and the liberalization of finance.

As a result of underpricing of risk, these become more frequent and when there are failures the costs are higher than expected. Crises become more frequent and more severe as the scope and volume of financial transactions increases. All of this is increased still further by the fanaticism of the market fundamentalists who dismantled the regulatory apparatus and permitted the creation of exotic and opaque financial instruments.

is a kind of irrational fundamentalism because it is clear that weakening regulatory mechanisms in a market system incorporates a risk of crisis disastrous. These are senseless acts except for short-term interest of the lords of the economy and society. The financial corporations can and did make tremendous short term profits from pursuing extremely adventurous activities, including especially deregulation, which harm the economy generally, but not for them, at least in the short run that is what guides your planning.

In the U.S., real wages remained virtually stagnant for the majority for thirty years.

Chomsky: No one could predict the exact timing of a severe crisis, you could not predict the exact scope of the crisis, but it was obvious she would. In fact, were serious and repeated crises during this period of increasing deregulation. Except that until now had not hit so hard at the center of wealth and power, but above all the countries of the third world. Take the case of the United States. It is a rich country, but for a substantial majority of the population, the last thirty years have probably been among the worst in American economic history. There have been no massive crises, large wars, depressions, etc.. However, real wages remained virtually stagnant for the majority for thirty years.

In the international economy, the effect of liberalization income was quite harmful. We read in the press that the last thirty years, neoliberalism, showed the greatest decrease in poverty in world history and tremendous growth, etc.. There is some truth in this, but what's left to say is that poverty reduction and growth occurred in countries which ignored the neoliberal rules, as occurred in East Asia. And countries that observe such rules have suffered severely, as occurred in Latin America.

Joseph Stiglitz recently wrote that the recent crisis marks the end of neoliberalism. Chavez in a collective press, said the crisis could be the end of capitalism. Which one is closer to the truth?

Chomsky: First, we should be clear that capitalism can not end because it never started. The system we live in should be called state capitalism, not just capitalism. In the case of the United States, the economy relies very heavily on the state sector. Currently, there are a lot of anguish about the socialization of the economy, but that's a big joke. The advanced economy, high technology and the like have always relied extensively on the dynamic sector of the state economy. It's true of computers, the Internet, aviation, biotechnology, just about everything in sight.

We have a system socialization of the costs and risks and privatize profits.

Chomsky: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where I'm talking about, is a kind of funnel in which the public pours money and where it comes the technology of the future, which will be handed over to private power for sack the profits. So we have a system of socialization of cost and risk and privatization of profits. This occurs not only in the financial system, but in all advanced economies.

So, for the financial system, probably the result will be more or less as described by Stiglitz. It's the end of a certain era of financial liberalization driven by market fundamentalism. The Wall Street Journal laments that Wall Street as we know it, has disappeared with the collapse of investment banking. Some steps will be taken in the direction of regulation. That's right. However, proposals that are being made, more extensive and severe as they are, do not change the structure of the underlying basic institutions. There is no threat to state capitalism. Its core institutions will continue to be the same, perhaps even without major jolts. They may rearrange themselves in various ways. Some conglomerates taking over others and some may be semi-nationalized a weak sense, without this strongly affects the private monopoly of decision making.

However, the way things are going, property relations and distribution of power and wealth will not alter much though the era of neoliberalism operative for roughly thirty five years will surely be significantly modified. Tell the way, nobody knows how serious this crisis will become. Each day brings new surprises. Some economists are predicting real catastrophe. Others think that it can be patched together with modest disruption and a recession, likely worse in Europe than in America. But nobody knows for sure.

In its evaluation, we will see something like depression, with people doing work without the long queues for food in the United States and Europe? And if that happens, a big war to replenish the savings on foot, a shock therapy or something like?

Chomsky: I do not think the situation is comparable with the period of great depression, although there are some similarities to that era. The 20s were also a period of wild speculation and vast expansion of credit and loans, with the creation of an enormous concentration of wealth in a very small sector of the population and the destruction of the union movement. From this point of view, there are similarities with the current period. But there are also many differences. There is a much more stable apparatus of control and regulation of the New Deal, and although it was weakened, much of it remains intact.

Moreover, it is understood that the types of policies that seemed extremely radical in the New Deal period, are more or less normal. Thus, for example, in the recent presidential debate, John McCain, the candidate of the right, proposed the New Deal measures taken to address the housing crisis. Then there is the understanding that the government must assume an important role in managing the economy and, in fact, the advanced sectors of the economy are already living this experience for nearly 50 years.

There is much mythology that we need to disassemble: Reagan was the most protectionist president in U.S. economic history of the postwar period.

Chomsky: Much of what you read about this is pure mythology. For example, we read that Reagan's passionate belief in the miracle of markets is now being attacked. Attributed to the former president of the High Priest role of faith in markets. In fact, Reagan was the most protectionist president of the economic history of the United States after the war. He increased the barriers more protectionist than all his predecessors combined. He called on the Pentagon to develop projects to train American managers in Japanese advanced production methods. He carried one of the largest bank bailouts in American history, and formed a conglomerate based in the state to try to revitalize the semiconductor industry. In fact, he believed in a powerful government, intervening radically in the economy. When I say "Reagan" I refer to his administration. What he thought about all this, if they believed in something, really do not know and that's not very important. There is much mythology

we need to disassemble, there including what it says about the great growth and poverty reduction. In the United States, when the neoliberal rules were applied, the results were quite harmful to the majority population. Looking beyond the mythology, we can see that a state capitalist economy that, particularly since the Second World War, relied very heavily on the state sector, now is back to depend on the state to manage the financial system that is falling apart. So far, no signs that it will produce something like what happened in 1929.

So you do not think we are heading for a change in the order world?

Chomsky: Well, there are very significant changes in world order and maybe this crisis will contribute to them. But they have been for some time. One of the main changes in world order is being experienced now in Latin America. It is often said that Latin America is the backyard of the U.S. and that, long ago, is a region controlled by the U.S.. But that is changing. In mid-September had a dramatic illustration of this.

On September 15, there was a meeting of UNASUR, the Union of South American Nations, attended by all South American governments, including Colombia, the current U.S. favorite in the region. The meeting was held in Santiago, Chile, another U.S. favorite. Came out with a very strong declaration supporting Evo Morales of Bolivia, and reject the quasi-secessionist areas of this country who have the support of the United States.

Evo Morales responded, correctly, that this was the first time in 500 years that Latin America had taken its destiny into their own hands.

Chomsky: There is a struggle going on in Bolivia. Elites are being mobilized for autonomy and even secession, strong levels of violence with apparent U.S. agreement. But the South American republics took a strong stand in support of democratic government. The statement was read by President Bachelet of Chile, a favorite of the West. Evo Morales responded by thanking the presidents for their support and noted, correctly, that this was the first time in 500 years that Latin America had taken its destiny into their own hands without the interference of Europe, particularly the United States. This is a very significant symbol of change that is underway, sometimes called "pink tide". It was so important that it was not reported by the U.S. press. There is a phrase here and there, which notes that something happened, but completely suppressing the content and importance of what happened.

This is part of a long-term process, in which South America is beginning to overcome its tremendous internal problems and also its subordination to the West, especially in relation to the United States. South America is also diversifying its relations with the world. Brazil has growing relations with South Africa, India and particularly China, which increasingly involved in investments and exchange with Latin American countries. These are extremely important, which are now starting to spread to Central America. Honduras, for example, is the classic banana republic. It was the base for the wars of terror perpetrated by Reagan in the region and is completely subordinated to the U.S.. But Honduras has only added to the ALBA, the Bolivarian Alternative for the Peoples of America, proposed by Venezuela. It's a small step, but it is still very significant.

You think these trends in South America like ALBA, UNASUR and the major events in Venezuela, Bolivia and other countries may be affected by an economic crisis of the dimension we are facing now?

Chomsky: Well, these countries will be affected by the crisis but, at the time, not so much as being Europe and the United States. If we look at the case of the stock market in Brazil, it collapsed very quickly, but Brazilian banks are not breaking. Similarly, in Asia the stock markets are declining sharply, but governments are not taking control of banks, as in England, the United States and much of Europe. These regions, South America and Asia, somehow managed to separate themselves from the ravages of the financial markets. What set off the current crisis was the subprime lending for assets built on sand, and these of course are in the hands of U.S. and European banks. Possession of a toxic mortgage-based assets involved them very quickly in these events. Moreover, Europeans have their own crises of housing, particularly Britain and Spain.

Asia and Latin America were much less exposed, having kept more cautious lending strategies, particularly since the neoliberal meltdown of 1997-1998. A major Japanese bank, Mitsubishi UFG, has just bought a substantial part of Morgan Stanley, USA. So, it seems so far that Asia and Latin America will be affected as badly as the U.S. and Europe.

you believe there is a big difference between Obama and McCain with regard to issues such as the Free Trade and Plan Colombia? In Colombia, one can feel that the president and his supporters are scared about an election of Obama. I know you have the feeling that Obama is like a blank sheet, but thinks she will make a difference?

Chomsky: In fact, Obama has presented himself more or less like a blank sheet. But there is no reason why the Colombian government is scared of his election. Plan Colombia is Clinton's policy and there are many reasons to expect that Obama will be another Clinton. He is very inaccurate, for that matter. Even when explicit policies, they seem to be very centrist policies, as Clinton, who fashioned Plan Colombia and militarized the conflict.

I sometimes feel that the two terms of Bush were in the changing world order, trying to maintain power using force and, in return, Obama could be good for the face renegotiate the world order. What is your opinion on this?

Chomsky: It is important to remember that the U.S. political spectrum is pretty narrow. It is a company controlled by business, basically, is a one-party state, with two factions, Democrats and Republicans. The factions are somewhat different, and sometimes are significant. But the spectrum is quite narrow. The Bush administration, however, stood well beyond the end of the spectrum, extreme radical nationalists, extreme believers in state power, in violence overseas and a high government spending. In fact, they were so off the spectrum that have been harshly criticized even by power, from the earliest times.

Whoever assumes the office is likely to move things back towards the center of the spectrum. Obama may do so to a greater extent. I would expect in Obama's case, there will be something like a revival of the Clinton years, of course adapted to changing circumstances.

Now we are reaching the end of neoliberal globalization, there is the possibility of something really new, a good globalization?

Chomsky: I think the prospects are much better than they were before. Power is still incredibly concentrated, but there are changes as the world economy becomes more diverse and complex. The South is becoming more independent. But if you look at the U.S., despite all the damage Bush has done, remains the largest economy in uniform, with the largest market, the strongest military and most technologically advanced, with annual expenses comparable to the rest of the world combined, and an archipelago of military bases throughout the world. These are sources of continuity even though the neoliberal order is being eroded in the U.S., Europe and internationally with a growing opposition to it. So there are opportunities for real change. How far this change can come, it depends on people, what are we willing to undertake. "

07-Dec-2008

Translation: Katarina Peixoto

* Simone Bruno, an Italian journalist based in Colombia.

in. ESQUERDA.NET

How Much Does Facial Cyst Removal Cost

I like all

* I like them all I like you .

The conversation again with friends. The theme was always: women. Most said there was a definite type of women you like, but preferred this or that. When my turn came, my mind went blank and I once had a thousand pictures, "I like them all, I thought.

The thing, then yes.



I like that know what they want . The left
things clear from the beginning. Who can tell you they do not want anything serious but they could go without compromise. I'll say from the start so that later there are no damages or fighting. Perfect.
Those who can make mistakes but not 'confused'.
The head that tell you if they fail to feel something, and do not sway at will just so you do not hate. It is better to be sincere to be selfish.

I like the bold
The proposed and not let the man be the one to think and do everything.
Those who forget to wait much 'chivalry' and prefer a relationship where man and woman weigh the same.
which at least generally, are accustomed to or willing to 'go halfway. " Even to pay the man in some circumstances.
The other fields that are not afraid of 'what people think "and express themselves other appetites. And they have no qualms about taking the initiative.
The choteras, if you do not want something they say no, period. And sometimes you shit, but I like them.

I like that dress different .
The convention that would forget the 'nice' and take the 'alternative'. Alternative fashion or street fashion. In this city, I would call the 'Barranco'. Now call them 'artists'. Others will say, 'bohemian'. I love them. Please, never cease to be!

I like las interesantes
Las que tienen algo atractivo u ocurrente que decir (no necesariamente algo serio, pero algo que llame mi atención).
Las que con simples gestos, miradas, actitudes o formas de vestir captan toda mi atención y me hacen querer saber más de ellas.

Me gustan las que bailan sensual , porque no puedo quitarles la mirada ni dejar de pensar en lo que una buena amiga me decía hace poco: “De hecho los hombres creen que las mujeres nos movemos en la cama como bailamos”. ¡¿Acaso me atreví a contradecirla?!

Me gustan las coquetas , porque me enganchan at a time. I like the moves, because I was attracted to the forbidden. And so I also like the marbles, the innocent, the tranquility. And also my age, experienced and mature.

And I like all . The average texture of the plump and chubby, the flat, thin (never both), brown, white (not pale), the black or brown hair or blond. The light and dark eyes. The bold-eyed but tender. The soft, warm skin. The thick lips and kissing perfect: soft, suggestive and passionate following. And why not, in that trance of reckless and hot French kisses, which run through your body with your eyes, hands and lips, they are driven by the heat of the moment and fully to suffocate slowly and then galloping from one side to another, a bustling whose last gasp is followed by a look that says it all, at least in that time, as we are, one to the other. And nothing else matters.

I like them all, and whether or no longer makes sense, I like you because you have a lot of what I said.

* Credits (less but I do not know who used it: p):

selector marx's
pink.sneaker 's
kass's
Manel J Sánchez's
I'm so out of control ♥' s
Vane francisca's
tragicomedy's
sheislikeheroin . 's

Blogalaxia Tags:
I like

I like I like all